We were scheduled to be on the US air force flight C17 to McMurdo leaving at 7.30 am. A shuttle took us to the same place where we did our clothing. We were required to wear the Cold Weather gear. After the security check in they showed us film about Antarctica and the dangers involved in this adventure. We were then taken to C17 by a bus. This loud hippo (Airbus 330-200) can land on ice (of course it needs a longer runway). We enjoyed the five hour journey in its enclosed belly at the end of which we were treated with the breath-taking views of this end of the planet..
Monday, December 13, 2010
December 10, 2010... Gearing up for Extreme Cold Weather
The next day, our main task was to get cold weather gear from USAP's Clothing Distribution Center (CDC). We went there and tried all those different clothes. There are at least three layers and it is necessary to have pretty much all of them when you enter this cold continent. Here is a poster showing what you need to wear on the flight to McMurdo, Antarctica..
December 9, 2010... In the land of Kiwis
We arrived Christchurch pretty late in the afternoon after a 36 hour journey. But, the beauty of this place just dazzled us so much that the fatigue of travel simply vanished as we entered. It was so pleasant, green and bright that for a second we just forgot the worst weather in Blacksburg (the night before we left, we touched -20 degrees C!)
We had a wonderful afternoon at the Cathedral, downtown of Christchurch. It was not so difficult to keep being jet lagged when there were so many things to do.. My brain simply started jumping around with joy to even allow me to try hand at a life-sized chess. :D
That evening we had a nice Indian dinner at "Little India", heard a Scottish band practice in a garden, and even saw a statue taking a shower!
December 7, 2010... On our way to the South
It has been my dream to go to the space one day. I was always fascinated with the poles, especially because of the auroras, and several other astronomy related reasons such as the sun is either up in the sky the whole time just circling close to horizon or the whole sky rotates around just one point. But, I never really dreamed of being at any pole, especially the South Pole. Here I am.. Close to one of the poles. In fact, if you know, we cannot really go to the North Pole as there isn't one on land. It's somewhere in the Arctic Ocean. South Pole can be physically visited and more interestingly it physically moves by about 10-15 feet each year. The continent is not just a mammoth iceberg. It actually has land, live volcanoes. Apparently, the plate on which this continent is situated moves a bit every year, physically moving the South Pole.
Anyway, as a part of my space science project, this year I got a chance to be deployed in Antarctica, visit South Pole, work there on two instruments and the go to a remote place to fix a previously deployed instrument. This is a once in a life time opportunity and I realized this only when I was on my flight to Christchurch, NZ from where we were will be set to McMurdo, the largest base station on Antarctica under the United States Antarctic Program (USAP). After a rigorous physical examination, NZ Visa process, and a number of drills to set up our equipment, I was on my way to the South with two other colleagues: Joseph and Hyomin...
Sunday, December 12, 2010
Beyond the horizon -- क्षितिजाच्या पलिकडून
When I looked at the sky from India, US, I have always seen the Pole star depicting the North, Cassiopeia and the Great bear pointing towards it always.. Once having a glimpse of Large Magellanic Clouds (LMC) was all I could experience of Southern sky. Well, here I am at the opposite end of the Earth from the North. If I go further South from the South Pole, I would fall off the Earth! :P Just kidding.... My point is, I am at a place which is way beyond me-- Kshitija i.e. horizon.. :) I am in Antarctica, the highest, driest, windiest, coldest place on the Earth. I will be at the geographic South Pole. I will be at the Pole during the summer solstice of the southern hemisphere and winter solstice of the northern hemisphere (December 21), when Santa Claus travels down all the way from the North Pole (close to December 25), and even when the South Pole on the Earth physically moves (as the glacier drifts -- pole moving ceremony around January 1)! So, here is the diary from this heavenly place on our planet.
I will try to update my blog as and when possible depending on the internet availability here in Antarctica. I am also making a picture story simultaneously. You can find it under Destination Antarctica on my blog..
I would like to dedicate this whole story to four people. Baba and Mandar because of whom I am writing this in public instead of just my diary and to the two most beautiful girls in the world: Shreya and Parirani whose birthdays falls on 12/12 (the newest parirani arrived in this wonderful world only on 12/12/2010.. :) )
Monday, August 18, 2008
आहे माझ्यावर माझं प्रेम!
एक खूप सुंदर लेख वाचायला मिळाला आज 'सकाळ' मध्ये...
खरच स्वतः च्या प्रेमात पडून पहवाच एकदा तरी... सगला जगच सुंदर होऊं जाता मग... हा आहे माझा अनुभवही!
पहा तुम्ही पण हा लेख वाचून... आणि पड़ा प्रेमात तुमच्याच...
आहे माझ्यावर माझं प्रेम!
(आरती कदम)
स्वतःच्या प्रेमात पडणं म्हणजे आपल्यातली अमर्याद प्रेम करण्याची ताकद ओळखणं. एकदा का ही ताकद ओळखली, की आपण स्वतःवरच नव्हे, तर सगळ्यांवरच प्रेम करू लागतो. .......
तुम्ही स्वतःच्या कधी प्रेमात पडला आहात? स्वतःच स्वतःला खूप आवडला आहात? विचित्र वाटतोय प्रश्न, की असा कधी विचारच आला नाही मनात?
हा काही आध्यात्मिक प्रश्न नाहीए. साधा सरळ विचार आहे. आपण आपल्याला आवडणे यासारखी सुंदर गोष्ट नाही. आपण नेहमीच इतरांशी असलेल्या आपल्या नात्यांविषयी बोलत असतो, पण आपलं आपल्याशीही काही नातं असतं, याचा अनेकदा विचारच करत नाही. आपण आपल्यालाच काही देणं असतो. आपलं आपल्याशीच काही मागणं असतं. कधी मनाच्या या आवाजाचा विचार केला आहे? इथे आतला आवाज (सोनिया गांधी आठवल्या असतील) म्हणजे आपली विवेकबुद्धी अपेक्षित नाही. तो तर मनाचा एक वेगळाच कप्पा आहे... आपल्याला अंतर्बाह्य सच्चा ठेवणारा. हा आवाज आहे आपल्याला आनंददायी जगणं शिकवणारा. आपल्याला आपल्यावरच प्रेम करायला शिकवणारा. कारण एकदा का तुम्ही स्वतःच्या प्रेमात पडलात, की जगणंही सुंदर होऊन जातं.
स्वतःच्या प्रेमात पडणं म्हणजे आत्मकेंद्री, स्वार्थी प्रेम नव्हे, तर ते आहे आपल्यातली अमर्याद प्रेम करण्याची ताकद ओळखणं. एकदा का ही ताकद ओळखली, की आपण स्वतःवरच नव्हे, तर सगळ्यांवरच प्रेम करू लागतो. कारण आपल्याला जग होकारार्थी भासू लागतं. जगातली प्रत्येक गोष्ट आपल्याला हवी आहे तशी घडू लागते. कामात आपण जादा ऍक्टिव्ह होतो. मग त्याच्याशी जे जे संबंधित असतात ते खूष. समोरचे खूष की आपण खूष. विन विन सिच्युएशन!
म्हणूनच म्हटलं, तुम्ही कधी स्वतःच्या प्रेमात पडला आहात? नसलं तर पडून बघा. हे प्रेम म्हणजे काय, तर आपण आपल्यावर खूष असणं. तुम्ही कधी तुम्हा स्वतःला गिफ्ट दिलं आहे? म्हणजे कपडे, बॅगा, इतर गरजेच्या वस्तू या आपण गरजेच्या वस्तू म्हणून घेत असतो किंवा आवडलं म्हणून घेत असतो. (पैसे आहेत ते कुठे संपवायचे, म्हणूनही अनेक जण घेत असतील) पण एखादी ठरवलेली गोष्ट केली, किंवा बराच काळ रेंगाळलेलं, रखडलेलं काम पुढाकार घेऊन पूर्ण केलं म्हणून खूष होऊन स्वतःला बक्षीस देऊ केलंय? देऊन बघा. इथं फक्त एखादी वस्तू स्वतःला प्रेझेंट करण्यापर्यंत, किंवा आवडती खायची वस्तू घेण्यापुरतंच हे मर्यादित नाही. तर मनाला आवडेल ती गोष्ट करायची. कोणाला जर संपूर्ण दिवस लोळत काढायचा असेल तर यथेच्छ काढावा (इथं स्वतःचं घर हवं किंवा घरातल्यांना ही गोष्ट पटवून द्यायला हवी. सॉरी!) पण उलटंही आहे बरं! एखादी गोष्ट नाही घडली मनासारखी तर खूप वेदना होतात. अशा वेळी लोकांच्या भिडेस्तव दुःख मनाशी दाबून टाकतो. नकोच करायला असं. मनाचं ऐकायचं, मनसोक्त रडून घ्यायचं. मन स्वच्छ होऊन जाईल. मोकळं मोकळं!
आयटीच्या विद्यार्थ्यांसमोर बोलताना "तरुणांचा" लेखक चेतन भगत यानेही याचाच वेगळ्या शब्दांत उल्लेख केला आहे. त्याने या भावनेला तुमच्यातला स्पार्क जिवंत ठेवणं, असं म्हटलं आहे. हा स्पार्क जिवंत असला की तुम्ही भरभरून जगू शकता. एकदा का तो स्पार्क धूसर झाला, की जगणं साचलेलं डबकं होऊन जातं. म्हणूनच हा स्पार्क कायम ठेवण्यासाठी त्याने अपेक्षाभंग, नैराश्य आणि एकटेपणा या बाबी आयुष्यातून काढून टाकायला हव्यात, असं सांगितलं आहे. यात एक उदाहरण देताना त्यानं लिहिलंय, "मी नाही ऐश्वर्या रायसारखा सुंदर, पण म्हणून काय झालं! माझी दोन मुलं तिच्यापेक्षा सुंदर आहेत!' चेतनचा हा दृष्टिकोन, आणि अर्थातच त्यामागची भावना म्हणजेच स्वतःवर प्रेम करणं!
खरच स्वतः च्या प्रेमात पडून पहवाच एकदा तरी... सगला जगच सुंदर होऊं जाता मग... हा आहे माझा अनुभवही!
पहा तुम्ही पण हा लेख वाचून... आणि पड़ा प्रेमात तुमच्याच...
आहे माझ्यावर माझं प्रेम!
(आरती कदम)
स्वतःच्या प्रेमात पडणं म्हणजे आपल्यातली अमर्याद प्रेम करण्याची ताकद ओळखणं. एकदा का ही ताकद ओळखली, की आपण स्वतःवरच नव्हे, तर सगळ्यांवरच प्रेम करू लागतो. .......
तुम्ही स्वतःच्या कधी प्रेमात पडला आहात? स्वतःच स्वतःला खूप आवडला आहात? विचित्र वाटतोय प्रश्न, की असा कधी विचारच आला नाही मनात?
हा काही आध्यात्मिक प्रश्न नाहीए. साधा सरळ विचार आहे. आपण आपल्याला आवडणे यासारखी सुंदर गोष्ट नाही. आपण नेहमीच इतरांशी असलेल्या आपल्या नात्यांविषयी बोलत असतो, पण आपलं आपल्याशीही काही नातं असतं, याचा अनेकदा विचारच करत नाही. आपण आपल्यालाच काही देणं असतो. आपलं आपल्याशीच काही मागणं असतं. कधी मनाच्या या आवाजाचा विचार केला आहे? इथे आतला आवाज (सोनिया गांधी आठवल्या असतील) म्हणजे आपली विवेकबुद्धी अपेक्षित नाही. तो तर मनाचा एक वेगळाच कप्पा आहे... आपल्याला अंतर्बाह्य सच्चा ठेवणारा. हा आवाज आहे आपल्याला आनंददायी जगणं शिकवणारा. आपल्याला आपल्यावरच प्रेम करायला शिकवणारा. कारण एकदा का तुम्ही स्वतःच्या प्रेमात पडलात, की जगणंही सुंदर होऊन जातं.
स्वतःच्या प्रेमात पडणं म्हणजे आत्मकेंद्री, स्वार्थी प्रेम नव्हे, तर ते आहे आपल्यातली अमर्याद प्रेम करण्याची ताकद ओळखणं. एकदा का ही ताकद ओळखली, की आपण स्वतःवरच नव्हे, तर सगळ्यांवरच प्रेम करू लागतो. कारण आपल्याला जग होकारार्थी भासू लागतं. जगातली प्रत्येक गोष्ट आपल्याला हवी आहे तशी घडू लागते. कामात आपण जादा ऍक्टिव्ह होतो. मग त्याच्याशी जे जे संबंधित असतात ते खूष. समोरचे खूष की आपण खूष. विन विन सिच्युएशन!
म्हणूनच म्हटलं, तुम्ही कधी स्वतःच्या प्रेमात पडला आहात? नसलं तर पडून बघा. हे प्रेम म्हणजे काय, तर आपण आपल्यावर खूष असणं. तुम्ही कधी तुम्हा स्वतःला गिफ्ट दिलं आहे? म्हणजे कपडे, बॅगा, इतर गरजेच्या वस्तू या आपण गरजेच्या वस्तू म्हणून घेत असतो किंवा आवडलं म्हणून घेत असतो. (पैसे आहेत ते कुठे संपवायचे, म्हणूनही अनेक जण घेत असतील) पण एखादी ठरवलेली गोष्ट केली, किंवा बराच काळ रेंगाळलेलं, रखडलेलं काम पुढाकार घेऊन पूर्ण केलं म्हणून खूष होऊन स्वतःला बक्षीस देऊ केलंय? देऊन बघा. इथं फक्त एखादी वस्तू स्वतःला प्रेझेंट करण्यापर्यंत, किंवा आवडती खायची वस्तू घेण्यापुरतंच हे मर्यादित नाही. तर मनाला आवडेल ती गोष्ट करायची. कोणाला जर संपूर्ण दिवस लोळत काढायचा असेल तर यथेच्छ काढावा (इथं स्वतःचं घर हवं किंवा घरातल्यांना ही गोष्ट पटवून द्यायला हवी. सॉरी!) पण उलटंही आहे बरं! एखादी गोष्ट नाही घडली मनासारखी तर खूप वेदना होतात. अशा वेळी लोकांच्या भिडेस्तव दुःख मनाशी दाबून टाकतो. नकोच करायला असं. मनाचं ऐकायचं, मनसोक्त रडून घ्यायचं. मन स्वच्छ होऊन जाईल. मोकळं मोकळं!
आयटीच्या विद्यार्थ्यांसमोर बोलताना "तरुणांचा" लेखक चेतन भगत यानेही याचाच वेगळ्या शब्दांत उल्लेख केला आहे. त्याने या भावनेला तुमच्यातला स्पार्क जिवंत ठेवणं, असं म्हटलं आहे. हा स्पार्क जिवंत असला की तुम्ही भरभरून जगू शकता. एकदा का तो स्पार्क धूसर झाला, की जगणं साचलेलं डबकं होऊन जातं. म्हणूनच हा स्पार्क कायम ठेवण्यासाठी त्याने अपेक्षाभंग, नैराश्य आणि एकटेपणा या बाबी आयुष्यातून काढून टाकायला हव्यात, असं सांगितलं आहे. यात एक उदाहरण देताना त्यानं लिहिलंय, "मी नाही ऐश्वर्या रायसारखा सुंदर, पण म्हणून काय झालं! माझी दोन मुलं तिच्यापेक्षा सुंदर आहेत!' चेतनचा हा दृष्टिकोन, आणि अर्थातच त्यामागची भावना म्हणजेच स्वतःवर प्रेम करणं!
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Hello, Anybody There?
The recent series of bomb blasts in two major cities in India made me rethink a lot of things I have already been worrying about.. We need to think about the safety issues concerned, after all, with our own country.. Well, I came across this TOI editorial, July 29, 2008, addressing these issues and much more.. It ignites a thought in the minds of the readers about personal responsibilities.. If we call ourselves the biggest democratic country, why don't we act as a part of it?
Have a look at this:
TOI EDITORIAL: Hello, Anybody There?
India is under siege. With two serial blasts that killed 50 people and injured many more, live bombs defused in Surat and Ahmedabad, and bomb alerts in Kerala, Chennai and Delhi, fear is ruling the minds of people across the country. We wonder every day where terrorists will strike next. Make no mistake, this is a cunning, low-intensity war against the country, aimed at wrecking its social and economic fabric. Regrettably, the response of our governments — state and central — is hardly reassuring. The sheer incompetence of our security mechanism can only serve as an incentive to continuing attacks. We, however, should not turn into cynics or merely shrug at the failure of our administrators to meet the challenge posed by the merchants of terror. A hard look at India's experience in dealing with terrorism is urgently necessary to analyse why our institutions have failed to check the onslaught of terror.
There are multiple agencies to fight terrorism. They generate a huge mass of data. But how much of it is actionable intelligence? Very little, it appears. Take the Gujarat blasts. The attacks in Ahmedabad took place a day after Bangalore was targeted and when the state was already under a high security alert. In other words, the information from intelligence agencies was not sufficient to prevent the attacks or nab the attackers after they had set off the bombs. Of course, these terrorist groups choose their targets and execute the attacks after a great deal of planning with precision. But why are they almost always a step ahead of our sleuths? Over 550 people have died in various terrorist attacks since 2005. How many of the attackers have been arrested and prosecuted?
Security agencies have made arrests after terror strikes, but how many of these cases have withstood the scrutiny of the law? Obviously, there is something seriously inadequate in our security apparatus. Citizens of this country have the right to know where exactly the deficiencies lie. Are the intelligence agencies not adequately funded? Are the personnel improperly trained or not equipped with the latest technology? Surely, the Union home minister can find time to answer such questions.
The prime minister and the home minister have talked of setting up a new federal agency to counter terrorism. We have supported the suggestion in these columns. Law and order is a state subject. There are federal agencies — like the CBI and the IB — besides state police and local intelligence networks. The CBI has no mandate or resources to gather intelligence and its role as an investigating agency is subject to state governments' requests. In fact, a multiplicity of security agencies probably hampers any real crackdown on terrorism unless there is proper coordination among them. The US experience may be worth examining to help India relook at its security system. After 9/11, the US brought various government agencies under the umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security, a new cabinet department in the White House. Coordination became much easier and information sharing between agencies became the norm rather than the exception it was.
Even though India has been one of the earliest victims of cross-border terrorism, our security apparatus has remained largely unchanged. Terrorism has changed a great deal in the last decade. Today, it is a globally-networked phenomenon and its highly motivated foot soldiers do not respect geographical boundaries. And their concerns are not always local grievances. In such a situation, standard methods of policing may not be effective though the international dimension of today's terrorism does not diminish the role of local intelligence.
On the contrary, there has to be more emphasis on local intelligence to spot and monitor radical tendencies in society. Intelligence agencies may have to recruit more personnel from under-represented sections of the people to gain dependable awareness of complex undercurrents in our polity. And the political masters should allow the agencies a free hand to focus on their core job, which is dealing with the security of citizens. A new internal security doctrine, that is in tune with the new circumstances and takes careful note of international experience, needs to be worked out. The time for it is now.
While the government revamps the intelligence gathering apparatus and investigation mechanism, it should act fast on the legal system. When charges of terrorism are pressed in court, it takes years before they are settled. Suspects are jailed for inordinately long periods, often only to be cleared of charges. Such miscarriage of justice adds to the general suspicion that public institutions like the police and the judiciary are prejudiced. The judicial process not only has to be fast, fair and firm; it should appear to be so. More fast-track courts to try terror charges should be set up, more judges recruited.
A case is often made for draconian laws in the aftermath of terror strikes. However, there is no evidence to back the claim that laws like POTA help the state machinery to contain terrorism. Terrorists simply take advantage of the incompetence of the existing security apparatus and not of our allegedly liberal legal framework. Bad laws only undermine the democratic foundations of the country and create social resentment. There are no alternatives to effective policing backed by inclusive public policies. To achieve that, the government must wake up to the gathering storm of low-intensity conflict and act on a war footing.
I hope we will soon have a realization! India needs an awakening movement..
Have a look at this:
TOI EDITORIAL: Hello, Anybody There?
India is under siege. With two serial blasts that killed 50 people and injured many more, live bombs defused in Surat and Ahmedabad, and bomb alerts in Kerala, Chennai and Delhi, fear is ruling the minds of people across the country. We wonder every day where terrorists will strike next. Make no mistake, this is a cunning, low-intensity war against the country, aimed at wrecking its social and economic fabric. Regrettably, the response of our governments — state and central — is hardly reassuring. The sheer incompetence of our security mechanism can only serve as an incentive to continuing attacks. We, however, should not turn into cynics or merely shrug at the failure of our administrators to meet the challenge posed by the merchants of terror. A hard look at India's experience in dealing with terrorism is urgently necessary to analyse why our institutions have failed to check the onslaught of terror.
There are multiple agencies to fight terrorism. They generate a huge mass of data. But how much of it is actionable intelligence? Very little, it appears. Take the Gujarat blasts. The attacks in Ahmedabad took place a day after Bangalore was targeted and when the state was already under a high security alert. In other words, the information from intelligence agencies was not sufficient to prevent the attacks or nab the attackers after they had set off the bombs. Of course, these terrorist groups choose their targets and execute the attacks after a great deal of planning with precision. But why are they almost always a step ahead of our sleuths? Over 550 people have died in various terrorist attacks since 2005. How many of the attackers have been arrested and prosecuted?
Security agencies have made arrests after terror strikes, but how many of these cases have withstood the scrutiny of the law? Obviously, there is something seriously inadequate in our security apparatus. Citizens of this country have the right to know where exactly the deficiencies lie. Are the intelligence agencies not adequately funded? Are the personnel improperly trained or not equipped with the latest technology? Surely, the Union home minister can find time to answer such questions.
The prime minister and the home minister have talked of setting up a new federal agency to counter terrorism. We have supported the suggestion in these columns. Law and order is a state subject. There are federal agencies — like the CBI and the IB — besides state police and local intelligence networks. The CBI has no mandate or resources to gather intelligence and its role as an investigating agency is subject to state governments' requests. In fact, a multiplicity of security agencies probably hampers any real crackdown on terrorism unless there is proper coordination among them. The US experience may be worth examining to help India relook at its security system. After 9/11, the US brought various government agencies under the umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security, a new cabinet department in the White House. Coordination became much easier and information sharing between agencies became the norm rather than the exception it was.
Even though India has been one of the earliest victims of cross-border terrorism, our security apparatus has remained largely unchanged. Terrorism has changed a great deal in the last decade. Today, it is a globally-networked phenomenon and its highly motivated foot soldiers do not respect geographical boundaries. And their concerns are not always local grievances. In such a situation, standard methods of policing may not be effective though the international dimension of today's terrorism does not diminish the role of local intelligence.
On the contrary, there has to be more emphasis on local intelligence to spot and monitor radical tendencies in society. Intelligence agencies may have to recruit more personnel from under-represented sections of the people to gain dependable awareness of complex undercurrents in our polity. And the political masters should allow the agencies a free hand to focus on their core job, which is dealing with the security of citizens. A new internal security doctrine, that is in tune with the new circumstances and takes careful note of international experience, needs to be worked out. The time for it is now.
While the government revamps the intelligence gathering apparatus and investigation mechanism, it should act fast on the legal system. When charges of terrorism are pressed in court, it takes years before they are settled. Suspects are jailed for inordinately long periods, often only to be cleared of charges. Such miscarriage of justice adds to the general suspicion that public institutions like the police and the judiciary are prejudiced. The judicial process not only has to be fast, fair and firm; it should appear to be so. More fast-track courts to try terror charges should be set up, more judges recruited.
A case is often made for draconian laws in the aftermath of terror strikes. However, there is no evidence to back the claim that laws like POTA help the state machinery to contain terrorism. Terrorists simply take advantage of the incompetence of the existing security apparatus and not of our allegedly liberal legal framework. Bad laws only undermine the democratic foundations of the country and create social resentment. There are no alternatives to effective policing backed by inclusive public policies. To achieve that, the government must wake up to the gathering storm of low-intensity conflict and act on a war footing.
I hope we will soon have a realization! India needs an awakening movement..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)